UCMJ Article 128b Lawyer: Military Domestic Violence Defense

Legally Reviewed by: Robert Capovilla

When One Phone Call Turns Into an Article 128b Investigation

One call. That’s all it took. Your spouse called the MPs, or your command opened an investigation, and now a flag sits on your file, a no contact order controls your life, and you can’t picture what comes next.

You could lose your rank. Your clearance. Your right to ever carry a weapon again. You could lose your family twice, once in this case and once in the civilian court that decides custody.

Hire the best attorney you can as soon as you learn you’re under investigation for an Article 128b offense. Your number one goal from the beginning is to do everything you can legally to get these allegations dismissed. The Department of Defense is incredibly aggressive in prosecuting Article 128b cases, and it’s the most common court-martial charge in America. Our philosophy is simple: we give you an entire team with a full-time investigator, build your case from day one, and do everything we can to get the allegation dismissed before you’re charged.

Our UCMJ Article 128b lawyers have defended hundreds of Service Members across all branches of the Armed Forces accused of domestic violence. We have successfully fought these cases at courts-martial, boards of inquiry, and before charges are preferred, and we’ve done so at nearly every major installation in the world. Our team of attorneys, paralegals, and investigators are prior military prosecutors, CID, OSI, and NCIS agents, who now have dedicated their lives to defending Service Members falsely accused of domestic violence.

The Article 128b Charges We See Most Often

Article 128b is the UCMJ’s domestic violence article, and it applies to more service members than most expect. It covers assault, threats, protective order violations, and even property damage, as long as the government can tie the act to a spouse, an intimate partner, a dating partner, or an immediate family member. That breadth is one reason that cases get overcharged.

Congress created Article 128b in 2018, effective January 1, 2019, and it already covered strangulation, suffocation, and property offenses, including harm to a pet. The most recent change, in 2023, added dating partners as a protected category, so a boyfriend or girlfriend now counts too.

We defend service members against charges including:

• Committing a violent offense against a spouse, an intimate partner, a dating partner, or an immediate family member
• Threatening or intimidating a family member by committing an offense against them or their property
• Violating a military protective order or a civilian protection order
• Strangling or suffocating a spouse, partner, or family member
• Using a weapon or dangerous object to threaten a family member

If your command has flagged any of these against you, the exact wording on the charge sheet matters more than you think, and that’s where we start.

No Matter Which Installation Files the Charge, We Show Up

Capovilla & Williams is based in Woodstock, Georgia, but these charges don’t stay in one place, and neither do we.

We have defended service members across the country, including at Fort Rucker, Alabama, home of Army aviation training; Fort Bragg, North Carolina, home of the 82nd Airborne Division and Army Special Operations Command; and Fort Benning, Georgia, the Army’s Maneuver Center of Excellence. Our reach also extends to Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia and the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado.

A commander can request a military protective order the same day one of these allegations is reported, no matter which installation you call home, and we appear for clients wherever that happens. We’ve also represented service members stationed overseas, coordinating with local defense counsel and civilian experts across time zones so distance never slows the case down.

Contact our military domestic violence attorneys today to discuss the investigation and to start defending the Article 128b charges against you.

What You Need to Know About Article 128b

Article 128b (10 U.S.C. § 928b) is the UCMJ’s domestic violence statute. In plain terms, it makes it a crime to commit a violent act, a threat, or a protective order violation against a spouse, an intimate partner, a dating partner, or an immediate family member.

The government does not need to prove the relationship was a marriage. A boyfriend, a girlfriend, or your child’s parent can all qualify.

Penalties

Maximum punishment depends on which part of the article applies and how the offense was committed. The exact range is set out in the Manual for Courts-Martial, not in the statute itself.

A conviction rarely stops at the court martial. It can trigger a separate Family Advocacy Program record that follows your file no matter how the case ends. It can bring a bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge, and that discharge follows you into every VA claim you file for the rest of your life. It can also strip your security clearance, which means the job you trained for may no longer exist.

The penalty that catches most service members off guard isn’t the court martial. It’s what comes after. Under the Lautenberg Amendment (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)), a qualifying domestic violence conviction, even a lesser one, can bar you from possessing a firearm, on or off base, potentially for life. There is a narrow way out: if the conviction is later expunged, set aside, or pardoned, or if your civil rights are fully restored, the firearm ban may no longer apply, unless that relief specifically says you still can’t have a gun.

This reflects federal law as of July 2026.

How a Former JAG Prosecutor Takes Apart an Article 128b Case

Because we have navigated the military justice system from the inside, we know where the government’s case may be vulnerable. Our process is aggressive, methodical, and focused on dismantling the charges against you from the very beginning.

1. We request and read the full CID or NCIS file ourselves, not the summary your command hands you, because the details left out often decide the case.
2. We interview the witnesses on the government’s list and every witness they missed. That approach helped take apart all the charges in a Fort Rucker, Alabama domestic violence case after 16 months of digging.
3. We file the motions the government hopes you never hear about, from suppressing an illegal search to challenging a coerced statement, before your Article 32 hearing ever starts.
4. We prepare you and every defense witness for the preliminary hearing as if it were the court martial itself, because a strong Article 32 can end a weak case early.
5. We stay beside you from the first phone call from CID to the final result, because a former JAG prosecutor on your side knows exactly how the government builds its case, and exactly how to take it apart.

None of these steps are generic. Each one comes from cases our UCMJ Article 128b attorneys actually built, at installations across the country.

A Recent Article 128b Case Outcome

Real outcomes matter more than promises. Here is one case Mickey Williams took from allegation to resolution.

A decorated Navy Petty Officer is accused by his ex-wife of strangulation. The allegations are from years ago, and the accuser only comes forward with the allegations after our client files for divorce. Capovilla & Williams takes on the case and assigns a full-time investigator. We convince the Office of the Special Trial Counsel that the allegations are not strong enough to move forward, that we have evidence to attack the accuser’s credibility, and that we’re ready to fight this case as long and as hard as we can to clear our client’s name.

An Army Ranger is falsely accused of domestic violence after a neighbor reports that he slammed his wife’s head with the car door. After an exhaustive investigation by Capovilla & Williams, we uncovered evidence that the neighbor wanted to get back at our client and held a grudge. We were even able to interview the alleged victim herself, and during that recorded interview she clearly stated that no such abuse ever took place. The Office of the Special Trial Counsel declined prosecution, and the Command took no further action.

A Sailor faces a court-martial for strangulation and false imprisonment under Article 128b. At trial, the team at Capovilla & Williams established during cross-examination that the accuser’s story made no sense and defied common sense. Several witnesses were called to rebut her version of events. The panel found our client not guilty of committing an offense under Article 128b, and he was completely cleared of those allegations.

After 16 months, two motion hearings, and dozens of witness interviews, our client walked away with no conviction, no sex offender registration, and no dishonorable discharge. Every case is different, and a past result does not guarantee a future outcome.

Article 128b Questions Service Members Ask Us Most

Do I need a lawyer if I was just notified of an Article 128b investigation?

Yes. The moment CID, OSI, NCIS, or your command opens an investigation, decisions are already being made about flags, protective orders, and command action. Getting us involved early gives us the most room to shape what happens next.

What is Article 128b of the UCMJ?

Article 128b is the military’s domestic violence law. It covers assault, threats, and protective order violations against a spouse, an intimate partner, a dating partner, or a family member.

Can an Article 128b charge end my military career?

Yes. A conviction can result in a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge, and either can follow you into every VA benefits claim you file for the rest of your life.

Will a conviction affect my right to own a firearm?

It can. Under the Lautenberg Amendment, a qualifying domestic violence conviction can bar you from possessing a firearm, even off duty and off base. There is a narrow exception if the conviction is later expunged, set aside, or pardoned, or your civil rights are fully restored.

What is a military protective order, and what happens if I violate one?

An MPO is a no contact order your commander can issue the same day an allegation is reported. Violating it can bring new charges on top of the original case.

Does a Family Advocacy Program report get used against me in a court martial?

It can. Investigators often review FAP records and can shape how they charge a case, which is why we request and review that file early.

How is an Article 128b case different from a civilian domestic violence charge?

An Article 128b case moves through the military justice system, not a civilian court, and it carries consequences a civilian charge doesn’t, like loss of rank, clearance, and career.

Will this charge affect a custody case in civilian family court?

It can. A pending or convicted Article 128b charge is often raised in state custody proceedings, so we coordinate with any civilian family law attorney you’re already working with.

What happens at an Article 32 preliminary hearing?

It’s the military’s version of a probable cause hearing. A strong showing here can reduce or dismiss charges before a court martial is ever scheduled.

How does an Article 128b charge affect my security clearance?

Any report to law enforcement or a substantiated Family Advocacy Program finding could get reported to your security office, and that alone can trigger a clearance review before a case ever goes to trial.

What happens if my children could be called as witnesses?

Our military domestic violence defense attorneys have direct experience preparing family members, including children, to speak with investigators or testify in a military setting, and we work to make that process as protective of them as possible.

What does it cost to work with Capovilla & Williams on an Article 128b case?

Every case is different, so we review your specific charges and circumstances first. Contact us to schedule a confidential consultation, and we’ll walk you through it.

You Don’t Have to Face an Article 128b Charge Alone

An Article 128b investigation moves fast, and the earlier an Article 128b lawyer from Capovilla & Williams gets involved, the more we can shape the case, from the first CID interview to the moment a flag comes off your file. Both of our founding attorneys built their careers inside the Army JAG Corps before they started defending service members, and now that experience works for you.

You don’t have to lay out every detail on a form to get started. A short conversation is enough for us to tell you what we need next. Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation, and let’s start building your defense.

Share This Page: